Terrible critiques vs amazing critiques

Every writer needs critiques. As I’ve posted here before, critiques from beta readers are awesome at helping writers improve their work. However, that doesn’t mean that every critique a writer gets is helpful.

Critiques are there to point out what may not be working well in a writer’s story. But they’re all suggestions. No one has to follow word-for-word with what every critique says. There are some critiques that aren’t good at all though. Here’s some tips to help tell the difference between terrible and amazing critiques.

Terrible critiques:

Curse words (directed towards the writing or the writer)

Believe it or not, I’ve been cussed out in a critique before. The critic told me that my chapter reminded him of another work he hated (and cussed at), which I felt was directed towards me. No one should be cussing at you or your work at all. Throwing cuss words around does not help anyone.

No suggestions (that are meaningful)

I used to get no suggestions all the time in high school. My classmates thought since I was a writer, they didn’t need to critique me hard. So, they pretended to critique my work. I’d get comments such as “wonderful” or “you did great here” or “all correct”. None of their comments had any real suggestions of how to improve my writing. Some writers have done this to me as well. It’s more common than you’d think.

Even great stories, such as Harry Potter, can still have suggestions to improve it. No written work is perfect.

Bring nothing but brutal (even if it’s directed towards the work)

Having your work critiqued can feel like a personal attack. Some critics don’t understand this and just critique everything they can find too harshly (even without the cuss words I mentioned before). Instead of giving you suggestions or small pointers, they’ll nitpick every single detail without much praise or any praise at all.

This can cause the writer to have more stress and self-doubt than needed.

Amazing critiques:

Suggestions (for the story)

Most advanced critics will also give some suggestions to help out. For example, instead of just pointing out that the sentence doesn’t make sense, they’ll give an example of how the sentence could make more sense. The critics don’t do this to every single bit of advice, but they do it to a good number of them.

Praise (for the writer)

Advanced critics also praise the author, usually towards the beginning. In one of my advanced writing classes in college, everyone had to say something good about the story that was different from anyone else.

Since critiques are personal to writers, it’s helpful for the writer to also be reminded of everything great about his or her work. It’s also easier to take and understand critiques if the writer already has faith in his or herself.

Did I leave anything out? Comment below!

8 thoughts on “Terrible critiques vs amazing critiques

  1. Cussing? Sounds more like an online troll than a professional editor. That stinks. The point of editing is to help writers succeed–not make them regret writing! That’s why when I edit, I make sure there’s some actionable suggestions for the writer, but balance it with genuine compliments. That’s at least what I value. ❤

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s what I do too. When I edit, I mix in suggestions, grammar changes, and compliments all together. I never want to discourage a writer from writing. Writing is too much of a beautiful craft for that.


  2. Wow…cussing? That’s horrid.

    I can really relate to having someone critique your work and give nothing of value…

    I once asked someone to critique something. I told them that it was in VERY ROUGH form. It was actually a NaNoWrimo novel written in traditional NaNo form.
    Paragraphs were a mess-it had not been edited for typos-I had not organized the chapters and I stated that. I just wanted a general critique of the story-just the basic story.

    What I got was a rip-in of just what I said to ignore….sigh…

    Anyhow-that’s a writer’s life.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Some of my NaNoWriMo stories are rough too. One of them mentioned a witch in the first chapter, but everyone else in the entire novel was human. The person who was hinted at being a witch ended up being human. It was all a big mess. But those novels are supposed to be messy since you can’t edit them until they’re done. – But, it’s a writer’s life for me.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s